| Truth, Lies, & Politics When is a coincidence too much of a coincidence to be one? |
| For the Politics If You Live in One of These 18 States Your Vote May NOT Count Not Just a New York Problem --- Not Just a California Problem |
Fiction Stops Here |
| ~~~ |
| If you don’t live in NY and consequently don’t believe this is your problem. Think again. Do you live in one of these states or vote using one of these machines?
last year: AR – ESS, CA – Diebold, CA – Sequoia, CO – Diebold, CO - Hart InterCivic, CO – Sequoia, CT – Diebold, DC – Sequoia, FL – Diebold, FL – ESS, FL – Sequoia, GA – Diebold, IA – Diebold, IN – Diebold, IN – ESS, IL – Sequoia, KS – ESS, KY – Danaher, KY - Hart InterCivic, MD – Diebold, MN – ESS, NC – ESS, NJ – Sequoia, NV – Sequoia, NY –Sequoia, OH – ESS, OH –Diebold, PA – Diebold, PA – ESS, SC – ESS, TN – Diebold, TN – ESS, TN - Hart InterCivic, TX –Diebold, TX – ESS, TX - Hart InterCivic, UT – Diebold, VA – AVS, VA – Diebold, VA = Unilect, WA – Sequoia, WI – ESS, WV – ESS. (Please note, this is only a partial list of voting errors retrieved from information provided by http://www.votersunite. org/electionproblems.asp and does not include any errors occurring prior to October 2008. If your state or voting machine isn’t listed here, check the complete report at Voters Unite.) The magnitude of election errors resulting from electronic voting machines (including touch screens, ballot scanners and election tabulation computers) propped up by inadequate election laws has reached pandemic levels. While we may not always agree on absolute solutions, we must agree that this infringement on our rights should not be tolerated. |
| ERMA, scheduled to go into effect in 2009, intends to "modernize" New York's voting system using software-based voting machines that conceal everything election officials and the public are constitutionally required to observe and protect, and which have been proven vulnerable to undetectable error and fraud. ERMA unconstitutionally deprives election officials, the public and candidates of the very means necessary to detect and deter fraud or error and destroys the integrity of the election by making the will of the electors impossible to ascertain. We can no sooner cast off 232 years of wisdom and precedence than we can our Constitution |
In BradBlog’s 'Humboldt Transparency Project' Reveals Diebold, U.S. Federal E-Voting Scam, John Gideon and Brad Freidman report on Hundreds of Lost Ballots, Illegal Voting System, and the Boondoggle Behind Billions of Federal Dollars Spent on Voting Machines That Don't Work All Illustrated by Simple Citizen Oversight, Free Open- Source Voting System in One California County . . . However, consider CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, IN, MA, MD, NY, OH, PA, TN, UT, and VA also used Diebold/Premier equipment in 2008 elections and they all reported various problems. Did counties in these states lose votes as well in 2008 and 2004? See VotersUnite.Org's “Election Problem Log” 2004 to-date for a comprehensive list of voting problems. But Diebold/Premier’s gross negligence and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s failures cited in the Humboldt article do not stand alone. The Secretaries of State in each of these 14 states as well as California and the Supervisors of Elections in every county where the machines were used had 4 years to uncover discrepancies and press Diebold/Premier to get it right. |
Not Just a California Problem Not Just Diebold/Premier |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |